Statute of limitations for medical malpractice in Connecticut

Saturday September 27, 2014

Medical negligence or medical malpractice is defined as an act or omission by a medical practitioner toward a patient, which results in the patient suffering injuries or damages. A medical practitioner may include a doctor, nurse or even the hospital. Connecticut has strict laws against medical malpractice.

Medical malpractice lawsuits typically rely on a three-pronged test. First, the victim must prove that the medical practitioner owed a duty of care to the victim. Second, the act or omission by the medical practitioner resulted in negligence of the duty of care. Finally, the victim must further prove that it was due to the negligence of the medical practitioner that the victim has suffered the injury.

In most cases, medical negligence cases must be filed within two years from sustaining the injury or its discovery in exercise of due care. The statute of repose, however, lies three years from the date of the complaint. Customarily, the victim of medical malpractice or the victim’s family has approximately three years from the date of injury to file the lawsuit, even if the discovery was made late. There may be some exceptions made by the courts, if the victim and the victim’s legal team can prove the need.

One of the most effective ways of extending the statute of limitations is by proving a continuing duty of the medical practitioner involved toward the injured patient. The Supreme Court of Connecticut believes that medical malpractice lawsuits can be paid to drive the statute of limitation, as well as statute of repose in case the medical practitioner had, in fact, violated his continuing duty of care to warn the patient.

A three-pronged test must then be conducted to prove continuing duty of care under Connecticut law. First, it must be proved that the medical practitioner committed an offense in the first place using the above test. Second, it must be proved that the medical practitioner breached his duty of care, which continued after committing the initial wrong. Finally, the medical practitioner’s act or omission must have resulted in a breach in the professional standard of care. The burden of proof in a case against medical malpractice typically lies with the victim.

Source: CGA.CT.gov, “Medical Malpractice-Statute of Limitations,” accessed on Sept. 19, 2014

Get in Touch

Schedule a Free Initial Consultation

At Kennedy, Johnson, Schwab & Roberge, L.L.C., we handle all cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that we do not get paid unless and until you receive a settlement or a jury award.

Schedule a free, confidential consultation with a skilled Connecticut personal injury lawyer today.

News & insights
The Negative Impact of Tailgating
Articles

The Negative Impact of Tailgating

9

August
2022

Common Causes of Construction Lawsuits
Articles

Common Causes of Construction Lawsuits

12

July
2022

The Leading Causes of Trucking Accidents
Articles

The Leading Causes of Trucking Accidents

12

July
2022

Medical Misdiagnosis: What Is It and How To Handle It
News

Medical Misdiagnosis: What Is It and How To Handle It

11

June
2022

The Role of Lack of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice
Articles

The Role of Lack of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice

11

June
2022

How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
Articles

How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

10

June
2022

Connecticut Auto Accident Laws to Be Aware Of
Articles

Connecticut Auto Accident Laws to Be Aware Of

9

June
2022

How Liability Is Determined for Defective Products
Articles

How Liability Is Determined for Defective Products

26

May
2022

The Most Common Personal Injury Cases
Articles

The Most Common Personal Injury Cases

24

May
2022

How a Pedestrian Accident Lawyer Can Help You
Articles

How a Pedestrian Accident Lawyer Can Help You

22

May
2022