Regulators, trucking groups spar over public safety scores

Thursday August 28, 2014

State and federal transportation safety regulators and commercial trucking groups broadly agree that problematic — that is, comparatively accident-prone — carrier companies need to be readily identifiable, with incentives in place that will grab their attention and improve their shoddy safety records.

That agreement dissolves into a strong difference of opinion, though, when it comes to the optimal method for spotlighting higher-risk carriers and ensuring their enhanced safety performance on national roads and interstates.

Connecticut safety advocates and drivers have a vested interest in the debate, of course, given that commercial truck accidents are always a material concern in the state.

At the center of contention in a continuing standoff between the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and many trucking groups is the so-called Safety Measurement System developed by government regulators and touted by the FMCSA. Federal officials say that the methodology employed in the SMS tool helps to identify high-risk companies and improve their performance by pushing business to safer competitors. That is accomplished partially by releasing SMS-derived safety scores to the public.

A sizable consortium of trucking groups — including the American Trucking Associations, the nation’s largest commercial trucking organization — strongly disagrees that public dissemination of scores yields any salutary effect. In a recent letter the group wrote to the U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, the consortium stated that, while it supports a scoring model, the current scheme is based on information that is neither accurate nor reliable.

The trucking trade associations want the FMCSA to back off from issuing public scores until it makes necessary enhancements to the SMS tool that will provide for a more accurate scoring model.

The next move — if any — would appear to be with the DOT.

Source: Fleet Owner, “Groups ask DOT to hide CSA scores from public view,” Avery Vise, Aug. 26. 2014

Get in Touch

Schedule a Free Initial Consultation

At Kennedy, Johnson, Schwab & Roberge, L.L.C., we handle all cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that we do not get paid unless and until you receive a settlement or a jury award.

Schedule a free, confidential consultation with a skilled Connecticut personal injury lawyer today.

News & insights
Everything You Need to Know Before Filing a Pharmaceutical Lawsuit
Insights

Everything You Need to Know Before Filing a Pharmaceutical Lawsuit

21

September
2023

What Happens if the At-Fault Driver Is Deceased After the Accident?
Articles

What Happens if the At-Fault Driver Is Deceased After the Accident?

18

September
2023

What To Do After a Road Construction Accident
Articles

What To Do After a Road Construction Accident

12

September
2023

KJSR Attorney Stephanie Roberge Recognized as “Lawyer of the Year”: 2024
Insights

KJSR Attorney Stephanie Roberge Recognized as “Lawyer of the Year”: 2024

12

September
2023

KJSR Attorney John Kennedy Jr. Recognized as “Lawyer of the Year”: 2024
News

KJSR Attorney John Kennedy Jr. Recognized as “Lawyer of the Year”: 2024

8

September
2023

News

Six KJSR Lawyers Recognized as Best Lawyers® Award Recipients: 2024

21

August
2023

What To Look for in a Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Articles

What To Look for in a Medical Malpractice Lawyer

18

August
2023

How to Know Who Is Liable for a Construction Site Accident
Insights

How to Know Who Is Liable for a Construction Site Accident

11

August
2023

Workers’ Compensation Lawsuit: What To Know Before Filing
Articles

Workers’ Compensation Lawsuit: What To Know Before Filing

7

July
2023

How To Choose a Connecticut Construction Accident Lawyer
Articles

How To Choose a Connecticut Construction Accident Lawyer

5

July
2023