Is CT scanning enough for determination of spinal cord injury?

Tuesday November 25, 2014

The spinal cord contains the most sensitive and delicate collection of neurons in the human body. Spinal cord injuries refer to any injury or wound suffered by an individual to the spine or any nearby area. Legally, however, spinal cord injuries only take into account acquired spinal cord injuries suffered by a victim. Connecticut law does not take into consideration congenital diseases or injuries for the purpose of legal cases.

Detecting a spinal cord injury is very significant for the treatment and rehabilitation of the injured victim. However, some medical researchers are suggesting that CT scans may not always successfully detect spinal cord injuries. This can lead to misdiagnosis and hinder the injured victim’s recuperation. While CT scans are very successful in discovering any injury to the bone, injuries suffered in ligaments can be undetected in CT scans.

The National Emergency X-Radio Graphical Utilization Study has collected an array of information in order determine the effectiveness of CT scans for detecting spinal cord injuries. The studies concluded that cervical collars had to be kept in place and not disturbed for examining neck and back pains in case an MRI has not been conducted. Many studies further showed that CT scans missed many spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries often lead to prolonged medical care. Spinal cord injuries can lead to permanent or temporary disability. In some cases, these injuries can even lead to paralysis. Furthermore, motor nerves can be adversely affected due to spinal cord injuries. In addition to physical impairment and disability, a spinal cord injury victim may also suffer from psychological trauma.

Spinal cord injuries are a very serious health matter and it is imperative that healthcare providers take all necessary steps to properly diagnose and treat such injuries.

Source: National Center for Biotechnology Information, “Spinal cord injury resulting from injury missed on CT scan: the danger of relying on CT alone for collar removal,” Accessed on Nov. 21, 2014

Get in Touch

Schedule a Free Initial Consultation

At Kennedy, Johnson, Schwab & Roberge, L.L.C., we handle all medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that we do not get paid unless and until you receive a settlement or a jury award.

Schedule a free, confidential consultation with a skilled Connecticut personal injury lawyer today.

News & insights
Excavation or trenching is extra dangerous in spring weather
Insights

Excavation or trenching is extra dangerous in spring weather

24

February
2022

What are my chances of being injured in a fall on snow or ice?
Insights

What are my chances of being injured in a fall on snow or ice?

19

January
2022

Seat Belts in School Buses: Are They Safer?
Articles

Seat Belts in School Buses: Are They Safer?

14

January
2022

5 tips to winterize your vehicle for safer snow driving
Insights

5 tips to winterize your vehicle for safer snow driving

18

November
2021

Who is responsible for removing snow and ice from sidewalks?
Insights

Who is responsible for removing snow and ice from sidewalks?

15

November
2021

Tougher distracted driving penalties proposed for Connecticut
Articles

Tougher distracted driving penalties proposed for Connecticut

10

October
2021

These are the most dangerous roads in Connecticut in 2021
Insights

These are the most dangerous roads in Connecticut in 2021

22

September
2021

Pedestrian accidents: Deadlier than ever?
Insights

Pedestrian accidents: Deadlier than ever?

18

August
2021

Injuries children commonly suffer in automobile accidents
Insights

Injuries children commonly suffer in automobile accidents

10

August
2021

4 tips for drivers to better share the roads with motorcyclists
Insights

4 tips for drivers to better share the roads with motorcyclists

6

August
2021